« Outing conservatives and the limits of privacy |
Main
| Morning Darkness Saving Time »
March 09, 2007
SWAT-ing flies?
Radley Balko is likely the biggest blogosphere critic of paramilitary police raids. Yesterday, he highlighted a case in Akron, Ohio, where a woman and her 12-year-old son were caught up in a SWAT raid on a convenience store. The Akron Beacon-Journal reported:
Georgette Prince was making a quick run to the store last Thursday morning for orange soda and lottery tickets -- a venture that should have been an uneventful five-minute trip but became a terrifying 20-minute ordeal.
The unsuspecting Prince was caught in the storm of a SWAT team raid that had her in fear for her life.
Balko notes that "The SWAT team raid corresponded with a shoplifting investigation." Like any reasonable person, I thought that was insane until I read the entire article, in which you find this explanation:
Roach and Thornton explained that a SWAT entry was used because the "target," the store owner, allegedly had a violent background and carried a gun.
Ms. Prince confirmed that the store owner "had a gun on his hip." From this bit of information, I'd conclude that the use of a SWAT team to apprehend the owner would have been appropriate--if it had taken place at his home, not at a convenience store at 10 AM.
Related ITA entries:
Cops and robbers alleged drug dealers by Eric Seymour
A shocking injustice by Joshua Claybourn
Posted by Eric Seymour at March 9, 2007 12:49 PM
"Roach said it was understood that there was ``the potential for customers'' inside the store. But he said SWAT operations are done in a carefully coordinated and precise time frame."
Exactly. This is more than a mere shoplifting arrest, it was a multi-million dollar enterprise that was being brought down. Sorry she got caught up in it, but that is the way it is. The primary goal in SWAT raids is to quickly take charge of the scene and avoid casulties and destruction of evidence. Sounds like they did their job.
"Prince said her son, who has asthma, was soaking wet from being on the ground. She said she took him to a doctor the next day for breathing problems and she has been a bundle of nerves since."
And now we get to the real point of the story. Does anyone doubt an intentional infliction of emotional distress lawsuit if far behind?
Posted by: jeff at March 9, 2007 02:58 PM | permalink
We need these SWAT teams in Iraq.
Posted by: Alan K. Henderson at March 9, 2007 07:57 PM | permalink
Unfortunately, there's a large portion of America who is willing to give up the safety of innocent people in order to have the spectacle of big guns and big expolosions being used against criminals. This is a good example -- there was no crime in progress; no effort to simply arrest the guys.
We have way more SWAT resources in this country than we really need for fighting the threats that SWAT is to be used for -- crimes in progress, hostage situations, taking down groups of heavily armed criminals. Here, one store owner with a handgun on his hip (nothing illegal about that, convenience stores get robbed all the time) warranted risking the lives of several innocent people.
America is less safe, not because of the criminals, but because of the country's basic fascination and infatuation with using the biggest guns and most overwhelming force possible against criminals. We imprison more people than any developed nation in the world, and we put women and children at risk just so that the SWAT team can stretch its legs and put its training to use.
Posted by: Phil at March 10, 2007 12:00 PM | permalink
Posted by: Alan K. Henderson at March 11, 2007 01:43 AM | permalink
I think arguing the merits of this specific case misses the overall point, which is the question of how often SWAT teams should be used. It has been 14 years since the Waco disaster, which should have been a wake-up call about the use of paramilitary force in normal police work. I think we have more to fear from the government than we do from criminals.
Posted by: Scott Tibbs at March 11, 2007 10:06 PM | permalink
Post a comment