« Double Take |
Main
| Free thy lady »
February 22, 2007
Mitt Romney's Many Faces
When RedState editor Erick Erickson announced he was "done" the "Multiple Choice Mitt," it set off a heavy discussion around the blogosphere about Mitt's viability. I particularly like Ruth Marcus' take in the Washington Post:
Listening to Romney that day was like watching a chameleon in the fleeting moment that its color changes to suit its environment.
These skeptics are not alone, and the buildup to this opposition has been a long time running. As recently as his 2002 campaign for governor,
Romney advocated a strong pro-choice stance. Then came the
discovery of this video, highlighting the liberal positions Romney took in his 1994 Senate race.
Although abortion is likely the most controversial leftist position Romney has reconsidered, it is by no means the only one. He has changed his position on gays in the military, supporting the "Don't ask, don't tell" policy after opposing it during the 90's. Romney also supported a federal gas tax hike and opposed Bush's tax cuts as late as 2003. Perhaps the most egregious sin in the eyes of some conservatives was the revelation that Romney voted for Democrat Paul Tsongas in the 1992 Massachusetts primary and then changed his story on why he did it.
Most of this probably comes as little surprise to pundits familiar with Massachusetts politics. But to most of the country this only reinforces an already skeptical view of the man. As this Gallup poll reveals, not a lot of people have heard of him, but the more they hear, the more his unfavorables rise. The GOP can do better.
Related ITA entries:
"Make Room for Mitt?" by D. Darlington
"Romney's Pro-Life Rumblings" by S. Zirkle
Posted by Joshua Claybourn at February 22, 2007 09:27 AM
"The GOP can do better." I don't deny that that's generally true; but is it obviously so in this particular electoral cycle?
Posted by: philosopher at February 22, 2007 12:26 PM | permalink
I suspect that the candidates who would make GOP primary voters ecstatic are waiting until 2012, understanding that they would be CRUSHED in the '08 general election.
Posted by: JohnS at February 23, 2007 10:13 AM | permalink
I always thought Tom Ridge would be a good candidate. It bothers me that Newt Gingrich has high marks and he isn't even running (which may show you discontent with the current nominees).
But, I think Ridge was jaded by the current administration and realizes now is not the time.
Posted by: Anonymous at February 23, 2007 12:22 PM | permalink
Josh, I would have thought you smart enough not to buy into this nonsense. I've been trying to catalog all the particular charges I've seen and why not one of them merits any serious worry.
If Reagan could be accepted as a genuine conservative despite changing his view on abortion a mere one year before running for president in 1976, then why can't Romney be allowed to come over to the right side? It's as if consistently holding an evil view is better than realizing you were wrong and then demonstrating with your record as governor that you really mean your change of heart (which Reagan was never able to do). Bill Bennett about said as much earlier this week, which I just can't understand. Is changing your mind on something to accept the right view as bad as holding on stubbornly to a very wrong view?
It used to be that Republicans would accept people who changed their heart and allow for newcomers who have been won over to pursuing the conservative agenda. That period seems to be over, which means the Democratic party is going to be in control for a very long time. Either that or Republicans are going to be nominating liberals for the presidency, because everyone who has a chance will be afraid of becoming more conservative.
Mitt Romney is, without any doubt in my mind, the closest thing to a genuine conservative in the lineup for 2008 who has any chance at all of getting the nomination. But no candidate is ever going to be perfect. Reagan wasn't perfect. G.H.W. Bush certainly wasn't perfect. Even G.W. Bush isn't perfect. Mitt Romney would be fine as a Republican president, and he's given every reason to believe that he will continue the conservative direction his governorship took. I don't understand this vicious meme trying to represent one genuine change of mind and a few genuinely complex positions as if he's changed his mind on everything he can. It's even worse when people present him as wanting to have it both ways, as if he's still saying what he said back in 1994. This Romney flip-flop meme is thoroughly irrational.
Posted by: Jeremy Pierce at February 23, 2007 04:10 PM | permalink
Post a comment