<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Majestic and the Mercantile</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intheagora.com/archives/2007/01/the_majestic_and_the_mercantile/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intheagora.com/archives/2007/01/the_majestic_and_the_mercantile/?source=rss</link>
	<description>current events, culture, faith, science and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 05:40:35 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eric Seymour</title>
		<link>http://www.intheagora.com/archives/2007/01/the_majestic_and_the_mercantile/comment-page-1/#comment-2269</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Seymour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 15:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intheagora.com/2007/01/the_majestic_and_the_mercantile.html#comment-2269</guid>
		<description>Interesting discussion.  I agree that ads on tollbooths are unobjectionable, whereas ads in courtrooms would be unthinkable.  It&#039;s difficult, however, to formulate a precise statement about which &quot;public spaces&quot; are acceptable locations for advertisements.  Perhaps it would have something to do with how inherently &quot;commercial&quot; the space is.  Transportation is very commercial in nature--whether by bus, subway, air, or roadway.  No one objects to seeing ads on buses, subway stations, airports, and roadside billboards.  Ballfields (even local ones which are part of city parks) are also fair game.
As for the example in your follow-up post, if the state parks must have a tollbooth-style entrance to collect parking fees, I wouldn&#039;t object to a small advertisement on the booth, but there shouldn&#039;t be billboards elsewhere within the park.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting discussion.  I agree that ads on tollbooths are unobjectionable, whereas ads in courtrooms would be unthinkable.  It&#8217;s difficult, however, to formulate a precise statement about which &#8220;public spaces&#8221; are acceptable locations for advertisements.  Perhaps it would have something to do with how inherently &#8220;commercial&#8221; the space is.  Transportation is very commercial in nature&#8211;whether by bus, subway, air, or roadway.  No one objects to seeing ads on buses, subway stations, airports, and roadside billboards.  Ballfields (even local ones which are part of city parks) are also fair game.<br />
As for the example in your follow-up post, if the state parks must have a tollbooth-style entrance to collect parking fees, I wouldn&#8217;t object to a small advertisement on the booth, but there shouldn&#8217;t be billboards elsewhere within the park.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
