« A Call to Civility | Main | Losing a Legend »

November 16, 2006

The Pursuit of Happiness

An article at CNN.com about Harvard psychologist Daniel Gilbert's research into happiness contains some interesting tidbits. The first being that money really doesn't buy happiness. According to the article, once your basic needs are met (which Gilbert places at an income level of $50,000--but this would surely vary depending on where you live), additional income doesn't result in additional happiness.

Secondly, according to a Pew Research Center survey, religious people are happier than the non-religious, and Republicans are happier than Democrats. The article doesn't indicate whether the survey was taken before or after this month's election. Nor can it tell us whether being a Republican makes one happy, or if happy people tend to become Republicans. It's worth noting, though, that a 2004 ABC News survey found that more Republicans than Democrats were satisfied with their sex lives.

Finally, as to that classic conundrum--vacation or new car?--Gilbert has this to say:

"Part of us believes the new car is better because it lasts longer. But, in fact, that's the worst thing about the new car," he said. "It will stay around to disappoint you, whereas a trip to Europe is over. It evaporates. It has the good sense to go away, and you are left with nothing but a wonderful memory."

So true.

Posted by Eric Seymour at November 16, 2006 05:38 PM

Comments

One of the most interesting results in that body of research suggests that one of the worst decisions you can make is to give yourself a longer commute for a bigger house (i.e., to move out to the far suburbs or something like that). Along the lines with the bit Eric quotes about the car vs. vacation, apparently you get used to the bigger house fairly quickly. But the unpleasantness of the commute just returns and returns....

Posted by: philosopher at November 16, 2006 06:07 PM | permalink

Y'know, considering what the comparative power statuses of the two parties were when that ABC survey was done -- August 2-9, 2004 -- one might well wonder what the results would be if such a poll were conducted today...

"Nor can it tell us whether being a Republican makes one happy, or if happy people tend to become Republicans." Or, of course, whether there is a third factor that is primarily responsible, which is at least somewhat connected to both. (E.g., high income; attending church regularly; living where it's sunny....)

Posted by: philosopher at November 16, 2006 09:01 PM | permalink

Y'know, considering what the comparative power statuses of the two parties were when that ABC survey was done -- August 2-9, 2004 -- one might well wonder what the results would be if such a poll were conducted today...

So...you're suggesting that whether one's favored political party is in power has some bearing on how satisfied one is with their sex life?

Posted by: Eric Seymour at November 16, 2006 10:32 PM | permalink

It would be unsurprising if sexual satisfaction is somewhat sensitive to other affective factors, such as stress level, general perceived quality of life, and so on. Indeed, it would be more surprising if one's sex life wasn't influenced by such things.

Posted by: philosopher at November 16, 2006 10:55 PM | permalink

Of all the important questions it doesn't answer, it doesn't - and can't - tell us whether being happy is a good in itself.

Posted by: jpe at November 17, 2006 10:33 PM | permalink

Mutatis mutandis, that applies to political affiliation and sex.

Heh.

Posted by: jpe at November 17, 2006 10:34 PM | permalink

Post a comment




Remember Me?





(you may use HTML tags for style)

 
---- ADVERTISEMENTS ----



Rankings and Aggregators
Technocrati
Blogdom of God
Who Links Here

Site Meter