« Peace prizes--Nobel and otherwise | Main | A Cultural Milestone »

October 14, 2006

Another Brick in the Wall

First it was the soccer moms. Now will religous whites abandon the GOP this November? Gallup seems to think so:


An analysis of USA Today/Gallup poll trend data indicates that while Democrats have made gains across the board on the generic Congressional ballot in the latest Oct. 6-8 survey, the change has been greater among religious whites than among less religious whites and among non whites. At this point, religious whites are equally as likely to say they will vote Democratic as Republican, a marked change from their strong tilt towards the Republicans in surveys conducted June through September.

For the purpose of political analysis this year, Gallup has divided the American population into three groups based on race and church attendance: Religious whites (defined as whites who self-report attending church weekly or almost every week), less religious whites (defined as whites who self-report attending church monthly or less often), and all others.
[...]

Religious whites went from an average Democratic disadvantage of 23 points across the June through September months, to dead even in October. Less religious whites shifted only seven points across these two time periods, while the group of "all others" shifted 9 points.
[...]

The data reviewed here suggest that the Republicans have lost -- at least temporarily -- some of the disproportionate advantage in voting preference they have enjoyed among religious whites. This group continues to be much more likely than less religious whites or nonwhites to support the Republican candidate in their House race, and is currently as likely to support a Democrat as a Republican Congressional candidate. But, the difference between religious whites and these other two groups has narrowed somewhat as of the Oct. 6-8 poll.


Surely the Mark Foley scandal has had some impact on the drop in support for the GOP among white Christians (who are what we're really talking about here). Also, I think, is the growing realization among Christian conservatives that the kingmakers in the GOP don't take them seriously. There have been reports in recent weeks that Karl Rove, et al, consider the major players in the Christian Right "nuts," and only give them enough to maintain voter turnout. That's why I can't get worked up over the article ITA reader "philosopher" linked to earlier this week, or over the various "fundamentalist takeover" scaremongers like Andrew Sullivan, Christie Whitman, or Kevin Phillips. As I've said before, the Christian Right is on the decline and is more played than player anyway, so it doesn't surprise me that religious whites might just stay home this time around.

(The quotes from Gallup are via The Moderate Voice, since I don't have complete access to the Gallup site)

Posted by David Darlington at October 14, 2006 03:37 PM

Comments

Rove may think they're nuts, but that didn't stop the president's top advisor from going to Dobson for a Harriet Miers nomination seal of approval.

This could be just more 'placating the nuts' - but it has 10 GOP co-sponsors in the Senate and guys like this are running their '06 Congressional election campaigns based on his promised co-sponsorship of it.

As long as there appears to be a continuing effort by the Christian Right (whatever its size) to shift the sovereign source of law and government from us citizens to God, we'd be smart to heed the warnings of Sullivan, Whitman, Phillips, Gary Hart, Bill Moyers, and others.


Posted by: JohnS at October 15, 2006 11:02 AM | permalink

"...and only give them enough to maintain voter turnout."

Along the lines of what JohnS said -- that "only enough" may still be far, far too much, if it means sacrificing things like our nation's science policy; or not discharging patently lunatic generals who rant about how our god can kick their god's ass; or wasting significant chunks of the treasury on indefensible tax exemptions & purely political quasi-religious pork; or allowing these people so strong a say in the selection of federal judges. That's still an awful lot to get worried about. If any comparable group on the left had anywhere near the same say in the Democratic Party that these people have in the highest ranks of the Republican Party, it'd certainly worry me.

Posted by: philosopher at October 15, 2006 12:36 PM | permalink

Post a comment




Remember Me?





(you may use HTML tags for style)

 
---- ADVERTISEMENTS ----



Rankings and Aggregators
Technocrati
Blogdom of God
Who Links Here

Site Meter