« A Tale of Two Faces | Main | Tooting My Own Horn »

September 20, 2006

Let the horse race begin!

While Jonah Goldberg is contemplating a Democratic takeover of the House, Scott Elliott of Election Projection is predicting (at this point) that the GOP will hang onto the House with a very thin 9-seat advantage. Elliott is a Christian conservative Republican, but in 2004 his final prediction handed Bush 289 electoral votes--off by only 3.

Elliott also predicts (as do most analysts) that the GOP will hold the Senate (losing three seats), but projects that the Dems will have the majority of state Governors after November 7. With the mid-term elections a mere 7 weeks away, this political junkie will be checking Election Projection more and more often.

Update: I forgot to mention this when posting last night, but what's remarkable about Elliott's House projection is that the only state where the Dems are picking up more than one seat is the Republican stronghold and ITA home base of Indiana, where he currently projects the Democrats will pick up not just two, but three seats. That would be an incredible gain, especially since the state only has nine total seats. A three-seat shift in swing state Ohio (with its 18 total seats) I could understand, but what the heck is going on in Indiana?

Posted by Eric Seymour at September 20, 2006 06:22 PM

Comments

Democratic party strategists (not the grassroots who continue to struggle through the Bush Years) might actually welcome the Elliott scenario, as some economists are predicting an economic downturn in '07as the housing market cools (collapses?) and as the reality sinks in that we have lost the war in Iraq (that won't happen until after November). Better to leave the Republicans holding the bag when the poo-storm hits, the thinking might go, leaving the Dems in even better shape for '08---the big enchilada.

Posted by: JohnS at September 21, 2006 09:43 AM | permalink

I give up trying to use style tags here! Let's try that again.

Democratic party strategists (not the grassroots who continue to struggle through the Bush Years) might actually welcome the Elliott scenario, as some economists are predicting an economic downturn in '07as the housing market cools (collapses?) and as the reality sinks in that we have lost the war in Iraq (that won't happen until after November). Better to leave the Republicans holding the bag when the poo-storm hits, the thinking might go, leaving the Dems in even better shape for '08---the big enchilada.

Posted by: JohnS at September 21, 2006 09:45 AM | permalink

Congressional Quarterly just came out with projections that the GOP will keep both houses as well: http://sixers.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MGJhYmJmODIwODc0YmY0ZDZhOTNiMzRlOTBkZTQzOGY=.

It's calling for at least 220 seats in the House (and 12 tossups) for the Republicans and 51 in the Senate (and 5 tossups).

Posted by: David Darlington at September 21, 2006 09:57 AM | permalink

"I remarked to a number of friends that I did not think the nation would elect a Democrat again until the Republicans had led us into a serious period of depression and unemployment."

FDR in a 1924 letter to Delaware attorney Willard Saulsbury after that year's disappointing elections.

http://hnn.us/articles/8669.html

Posted by: JohnS at September 21, 2006 11:23 AM | permalink

Given that (i) at the state/local level the two parties are really fairly close to even in Indiana (the statehouse flips control something like every other election, I think), but (ii) right now the GOP has 7 of the 9 Congressional seats, and moreover (iii) the general prevailing political wind these days is blowing in the Dems favor: it really isn't all that surprising that as many as 3 seats might flip from R to D this time around.

I'd note that in Ohio, the Gop outnumbers the Dems something like 2 to 1 in the state legislature; and their current congressional delegation is 11 Republicans and 7 Democrats. So their Congressional ratio is both closer to their statehouse ratio, and moreover their Congressional ratio is already on the Dem-leaning side of their statehouse ratio. Really, the surprising thing seems to me to be more: why is it that Indiana is so stalwartly Republican in presidential elections, and Ohio the swing state, and not the other way around?

Posted by: philosopher at September 21, 2006 04:32 PM | permalink

Post a comment




Remember Me?





(you may use HTML tags for style)

 
---- ADVERTISEMENTS ----



Rankings and Aggregators
Technocrati
Blogdom of God
Who Links Here

Site Meter