« PMDC Wrapping Up | Main | "Like being Instapundit for Indiana blogs" . . . »

February 24, 2006

Olympics Update

I'd like to start off this update by asking what's the deal with the medals the winners are getting this year in Torino. Do they get 5000 free hours of AOL with these things?

torino_medal.jpg

Anyway, here are the top 10. Canada vaulted ahead of Great Britain, the Netherlands, and Cuba to break into the top 10 since the last time I reported the total. Also, China and Germany, Italy and France, and (South) Korea and Japan are in close competition for positions:

 

Gold

Silver

Bronze

Combined total

United States

43

48

35

126

Russian Fed.

35

21

22

78

China

34

20

18

72

Germany

23

26

23

72

Australia

18

16

17

51

Italy

14

11

17

42

France

14

11

17

42

Korea

13

15

10

38

Japan

17

9

12

38

Canada

9

14

9

32

Great Britain

9

10

12

31

Netherlands

7

11

13

31

Cuba

9

7

11

27

Ukraine

9

5

11

25

Norway

7

8

9

24

Austria

10

9

4

23

Romania

8

5

6

19

Spain

3

11

5

19

Sweden

9

3

7

19

Switzerland

6

5

7

18

Hungary

8

6

3

17

Greece

6

6

4

16

Bulgaria

2

2

9

13

Czech Republic

2

5

4

11

Brazil

4

3

3

10

Finland

0

7

3

10

Croatia

2

4

2

8

Estonia

3

1

2

6

Posted by Eric Seymour at February 24, 2006 05:39 PM

Comments

You know how some times people will try to cover up how bad something looks by saying "Well the average looks all right"? Like, just hypothetically, "well we lost 400,000 jobs this month, but the average over the year is still good"?

I get the feeling there's some element of that in looking at the combined medal counts over the Summer & Winter games.

Posted by: Balta at February 24, 2006 09:54 PM | permalink

Congrats to Irina for that bronze DVD, er, medal.

Posted by: Alan K. Henderson at February 24, 2006 11:16 PM | permalink

I'm told that a country typicallly wins as much as 20% more medals than usual when they host the Olympics, which may explain why we dominated os much in the previous cycle. Nevertheless, we appear to be catching up with Germany and may overtake them this time around. (Although one wonders just how may of our medal winner are of German descent.)

Posted by: Joshua Claybourn at February 25, 2006 02:14 AM | permalink

For what it's worth, and not much...

the "Anglosphere" has 240 medals out of this group. Not bad for the sons of Albion.

Posted by: J A Greer at February 25, 2006 02:50 AM | permalink

That's a massive image and it takes too long for thepage to load. Could you find a smaller one?

Posted by: Anonymous at February 25, 2006 05:52 PM | permalink

That's a massive image and it takes too long for thepage to load. Could you find a smaller one?

It is ITA's new 56k detection system!

Does anyone know why they opted for a medal that looks like an optical disk or a giant washer?

Posted by: Foltz at February 25, 2006 06:20 PM | permalink

The medals are supposed to represent the Italian piazzas.

They've been compared to bagels since the designs were introduced a year ago. No one seems to care what they look like once they are around their neck.

I personally appreciate how they are designing innovative Olympic medals instead of the staid round cirles.

Posted by: Anonymous at February 27, 2006 09:27 AM | permalink

Post a comment




Remember Me?





(you may use HTML tags for style)

 
---- ADVERTISEMENTS ----



Rankings and Aggregators
Technocrati
Blogdom of God
Who Links Here

Site Meter