« Your Mom Goes to College | Main | Another Irresistible List »

October 21, 2005

Dial-Up isn't Dead

Apparently it's just pining for the fjords. Forty percent of Americans are still using dial-up connections to browse the web from home. While compression technology has made dial-up much better than it was five years ago, it still doesn't even come close to broadband in speed capability. In the test cited, loading Amazon's start page took 29 seconds with dial-up on the initial hit and 11 seconds after caching, but only 5 seconds with a broadband connection. I don't know about you, but I'm not cutting my web browsing speed 50 to 75 percent just to save $20 a month.

Posted by David Darlington at October 21, 2005 07:37 PM

Comments

I'm one of those dialup users. Anyone recommend a goos DSL provider? Ones to avoid like the plague?

Posted by: Alan K. Henderson at October 21, 2005 09:51 PM | permalink

Yes, I've just singed up with SBC/Yahoo DSL and I'm very pleased.

I agree with you David, I was offline for over a year and it was due to refusing to endure dial-up.

I had broad-band, but financial difficulties forced me to cut costs and I downgraded to dial-up but then cut it off completely because it was too much aggrivation.

If I can't get a simple web-page up in a few seconds, I don't want to see it at all.

Posted by: Joshua P. Allem at October 22, 2005 01:07 AM | permalink

After Philadelphia announced it's intention to wire itself for broadband because large swaths (poorer parts) of the city were being ignored by cable providers, Verizon and friends went to the state to have a bill written denying local municipalities the right to do exactly what Philly was intending to do. Philadelphia's mayor threatened the state with lawsuits up the kazoo.

Pennsylvania's legislature came up with a compromise. In November 2004, Verizon got through it's state law to stop future Philadelphia-like efforts, but with Philadelphia exempted.

Under the new law, municipal utilities wanting to sell their own internet service will be required to first give their local telephone company the option of providing that service within 14 months. Verizon operates 6 million of Pennsylvania’s 8 million land lines.

Across the country, nasty conflicts have erupted as local governments try to create publicly funded broadband services with for all their citizens. The phone and cable companies object, claiming government intervention in their business is not justified.

Currently there is a bill going through Congress, sponsored by Republican Pete Sessions of Texas, that aims to ban cities from building municipal broadband networks.

There is also an opposing bill in favour of the city networks, backed by Republican John McCain of Arizona and Democrat Frank Lautenberg of New Jersey.

One industry group has launched a TV ad backing a bill before Congress that opponents say would empower the private sector to block community internet services.

Is broadband just a modern luxury, or an essential public service?

Posted by: JohnS at October 22, 2005 01:44 PM | permalink

My parents still use dial-up and it pained me to visit them and be stuck with that; thankfully, a couple of their neighbors have broadband and open wireless networks, so I borrowed theirs to check e-mail, etc.

In trying to get my folks to upgrade to DSL or cable, their excuse was "we only use it for an hour or less each day." My thought was, "yes, but you spend 45 minutes of it waiting."

They're certainly more than financially able to afford broadband, but until one actually has it and sees what it can bring you, the benefits apparently aren't obvious (sort of like how I once upon a time swore I'd never get nor need a cell phone).

Posted by: andy at October 23, 2005 02:54 PM | permalink

Post a comment




Remember Me?





(you may use HTML tags for style)

 
---- ADVERTISEMENTS ----



Rankings and Aggregators
Technocrati
Blogdom of God
Who Links Here

Site Meter