Executives and the Assembly

Consistency is really too much to ask of politicians, but the behaviour of the Indiana General Assembly (especially the House) has been aggravating as of late. Specifically, their disparate actions on the priorities of the two (arguably) most important executives in the State: Gov. Daniels’ push for DST and Indianapolis Mayor Bart Peterson’s IndyWorks.
As has been suggested and argued numerous times, including here at ITA by Paul Musgrave, that local government consolidation is a prudent and necessary step. Most Republicans agree, yet IndyWorks never had a good shot in the General Assembly since most GOP lawmakers decried the plan as half-baked. There were not enough details in the consolidation plan, therefore they couldn’t pass it. Excuse me, but the legislation switching us to Adjusted Time doesn’t even specify which time zone we’re going to be in! (Though, it’s apparent Mitch wants us on Eastern.)
So the uncertainty about the shape of Indianapolis Works doomed it, even when weighed against the evidence showing its practicality. This is also in large part because so many Republicans found that evidence to be unconvincing. The phrase “fuzzy math” was resurrected to describe how Peterson’s staff came up with numbers showing the benefits of consolidation. To some degree, I think Republicans have a point. (I’m trained to be a policy analyst, so I have an addiction to numbers.) But let’s also consider the math Mitch used to show us that DST would save our economy: none. He offered absolutely no studies demonstrating the wisdom of switching our clocks, even going so far as to say something to the effect, ‘We have to try something, so let’s give it a shot.’ This was his number one priority. Maybe Peterson was just wasting his time having his staff brief the legislators, since no numbers are better than some.


A further point could be made about political capital. Mayor Peterson was in the tough position of being a Democrat with a Republican General Assembly. He had two major initiatives, Indy Works and a new Colts Stadium. However odious public funding of a sports complex might be, he did manage to get that through, which is quite a feather in his cap. And at least some of IndyWorks came through as well. Not bad considering his circumstances. Mitch on the other hand, prioritized DST just above a balanced budget, declaring in his State of the State address:

But that was an oath I took last week. That was a Bible I took it on. I have sworn to uphold a constitution that directs us to produce an honestly balanced budget, and I was hired by the people of this state on a pledge to meet that assignment.

And now, he has a half-baked plan to put us on DST and no immediately balanced budget. I think he clearly could have vetoed the current budget and wrangled with the Legislature, including accommodating Democratic objections, for a new one . . . if he hadn’t spent all his capital getting DST approved. It took an amazing amount of time, negotiations, and “cajoling,” to get that stupid bill through the Legislature. We can only marvel at where else those resources could have been spent.
And as Paul noted, the passage of DST may very well cost him the House, and if so, passing it may be the last thing he’ll ever do. Mayor Peterson’s powerbase, on the other hand, isn’t in such a precarious position.

Share:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Fark
  • RSS
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • email
  • Reddit

  • No Related Post
bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark
tabs-top


8 Responses to “Executives and the Assembly”

  1. Doug Doug says:

    >>Excuse me, but the legislation switching us to Adjusted Time doesn’t even specify which time zone we’re going to be in! (Though, it’s apparent Mitch wants us on Eastern.)

  2. Anonymous says:

    Mr. Peterson formulated his “plan” secretly. That was a mistake. If the numbers are not correct then what’s to talk about? I think honest people will come up with honest numbers and it ought not now take too long to do so.

  3. Doug Doug says:

    Your stance against secrecy is laudable, Mr. Anonymous, but, if you could, please remind me what Gov. Daniels’ job creation numbers were for implementing DST?

  4. Karl Karl says:

    It may not be spelled out in the DST legislation, but it’s clear…
    If nothing is changed, that would be the effect, but unless what I have heard from the local media is wrong (and it could be), hearings are supposed to take place in the next year (presumably) on which time zone we will be in, and then a decision will be made. I cannot immediately recall everything that gave me this impression, but I did not think the time zone question was settled, yet.

  5. Doug Doug says:

    Ah, I see what you’re getting at. The legislation called for the Governor and the General Assembly to urge the U.S. Dept. of Transportation to hold hearings to consider revising the time zones.
    I probably disregard that kind of thing too quickly. But, since state lawmakers have no authority over the U.S. Dept. of Transportation and because the legislation didn’t really take a stand on where the time zones should be drawn (if they don’t remain the same), I don’t regard that part of the legislation as much more than fluff.

  6. Brent Brent says:

    Zach I never did and still do not understand your (or any other DST opponent’s)undying hatred for chaning the clocks one measly hour. The way you guys react you’d think changing the clocks would lead to nuclear holocaust.;)

  7. Nick Blesch Nick Blesch says:

    I think it’s silly because it doesn’t actually do anything; it’s not like we actually gain an hour or anything.
    I would far sooner support the other 46 states that use DST getting rid of it.

  8. Anonymous says:

    I have never seen any job numbers connected with time zone changes. It appears to me to just be part of the package for job creation. This package, by the way, fits well with the tax restructuring obtained via court decision and the last legislature. If we don’t begin to see some serious results in the next 18 to 20 months we might start asking some pointed questions.