You're In The Agora
Welcome to the Net's best new source for commentary on current events, culture, faith, science and much more.
Faith
Confessing Evangelical Evangelical Outpost He Lives Mere Comments Mirror of Justice Religion Clause Three Hierarchies Science Dispatches from the Culture Wars In the Pipeline New Scientist Tierney Lab Liberty A Constrained Vision Asymmetrical Information Becker-Posner Blog Hit & Run Instapundit Positive Liberty The Agitator Volokh Conspiracy Economics Café Hayek EconLog Environmental Economics Freakonomics Free Exchange Greg Mankiw J. Bradfor DeLong Marginal Revolution The Right Andrew Sullivan Best of the Web Eunomia Hugh Hewitt Michelle Malkin Power Line The American Scene The Corner The Left After the Future Ezra Klein Matthew Yglesias Political Animal Talking Points Memo Errata Daniel Drezner Democracy in America Dilbert Blog Lilek's Bleat Overcoming Bias The Sartorialist Hoosiers Daily Contentions Indiana Barrister Masson's Blog Matthew Stevenson |
|
« Tag team back again | Main | Judicial Rhetoric » March 31, 2005What we (don't) knowThe White House meekly links to a WMD Commission report on its front page today without much fanfare. That's probably because the "scathing report" says the spy agencies were "dead wrong" in most WMD judgments and that we know "disturbingly little" about threats posed to us. How comforting. Update: Even more comforting, the commission recommends a massive bureaucracy called the national counter-proliferation center to help prevent it from happening again. Posted by Joshua Claybourn at March 31, 2005 09:18 AM CommentsI imagine this is just one other way to spend tax payers' dollars, and another thwarted attempt at granting the citizens any source of comfort. I would almost rather them come out and be straight with us about how little they know than to keep pressing on with these "Go for the Gold" campaigns. It makes us look even more ignorant -- at that point, the enemy's winning. Posted by: Chrystal at March 31, 2005 12:00 PM | permalink Did you notice how insensitive President Bush's remarks were this morning about Terri Schiavo? He used her death as a segway to talk about homeland security... www.politicalcap.blogspot.com Posted by: J. Mark English at March 31, 2005 02:45 PM | permalink Did you notice how insensitive J. Mark's comment was? He used Terri Schiavo's death as a segway to advertise for his blog. Posted by: Anonymous at March 31, 2005 02:56 PM | permalink I haven't gotten very far in the report, but I'm already going to cry foul: pages 16 and 18 are not properly labeled, "This page intentionally left blank." Posted by: Zach Wendling at March 31, 2005 03:50 PM | permalink |
|
---- ADVERTISEMENTS ----
|