You're In The Agora
Welcome to the Net's best new source for commentary on current events, culture, faith, science and much more.
Faith
Confessing Evangelical Evangelical Outpost He Lives Mere Comments Mirror of Justice Religion Clause Three Hierarchies Science Dispatches from the Culture Wars In the Pipeline New Scientist Tierney Lab Liberty A Constrained Vision Asymmetrical Information Becker-Posner Blog Hit & Run Instapundit Positive Liberty The Agitator Volokh Conspiracy Economics Café Hayek EconLog Environmental Economics Freakonomics Free Exchange Greg Mankiw J. Bradfor DeLong Marginal Revolution The Right Andrew Sullivan Best of the Web Eunomia Hugh Hewitt Michelle Malkin Power Line The American Scene The Corner The Left After the Future Ezra Klein Matthew Yglesias Political Animal Talking Points Memo Errata Daniel Drezner Democracy in America Dilbert Blog Lilek's Bleat Overcoming Bias The Sartorialist Hoosiers Daily Contentions Indiana Barrister Masson's Blog Matthew Stevenson |
|
« Good news across the pond | Main | The Revolution Is Being Blogged » November 28, 2004SCOTUS HappeningsThere are rumblings in some legal corners to create a mandatory retirement age for Supreme Court Justices. An Associated Press poll found that six in ten Americans support the idea. Earlier this year, the Virginia Law Review published an article titled "Saving this Honorable Court: A proposal to replace life tenure on the Supreme Court with staggered, nonrenewable eighteen-year terms." Meanwhile Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist will be absent for the December session. That means he won't be hearing oral arguments from blogger Randy Barnett, who is arguing for the first time before the US Supreme Court tomorrow in the marijuana cases, "taking the liberal, libertarian pro-drug rights position." Posted by Joshua Claybourn at November 28, 2004 02:16 PM Comments |
|
---- ADVERTISEMENTS ----
|